Trump Wanted To Buy Greenland - Now China Is Taking It | Arctic Resource War

Thanks! Share it with your friends!

You disliked this video. Thanks for the feedback!


Added by
2 Views
???? THE ARCTIC IS MELTING - AND A NEW COLD WAR IS BEGINNING

Climate change is melting the Arctic ice. And as the ice disappears, a new ocean is being born—along with a new race for power between the world's superpowers. At the center of this emerging conflict sits Greenland: the largest island in the world, packed with rare earth minerals, positioned as the gateway to Arctic shipping routes, and suddenly the most strategically valuable piece of land on Earth.

This is the story of how climate change is redrawing the geopolitical map—and why China, the United States, Russia, and other powers are all racing to control Greenland's future.

???? THE STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE OF GREENLAND:

**Geography:**
Greenland is the world's largest island (2.16 million km²), 80% covered by ice sheet. It sits between the Arctic and Atlantic Oceans, positioned perfectly as a gateway to emerging Arctic shipping routes. As ice melts, the Northwest Passage (through Canadian waters) and Northern Sea Route (along Russia) could reduce shipping times from Asia to Europe by 40%.

**Resources:**
- Rare earth elements (critical for smartphones, EVs, military tech)
- Oil and gas reserves (estimated billions of barrels offshore)
- Minerals: zinc, lead, gold, diamonds, uranium
- Freshwater from melting ice (future resource wars?)

**Military Value:**
- Early warning radar systems for missile defense
- Strategic position for Arctic naval operations
- Airfield placement for intercontinental flights
- Submarine monitoring capabilities

**Population & Politics:**
- Population: ~56,000 (mostly Inuit)
- Autonomous territory of Denmark since 1979
- Growing independence movement
- Economy heavily dependent on fishing + Danish subsidies

???????? **UNITED STATES STRATEGY:**

After Trump's 2019 purchase offer was rejected, US pivoted to:
- Reopened consulate in Nuuk (2020) - first since 1953
- $12 million aid package for mining and tourism
- Billions in military upgrades (Thule Air Base modernization)
- $600+ million to counter Chinese mining deals
- Regular Arctic military exercises
- Diplomatic pressure on Denmark to block Chinese investment

**Why US cares:**
- Arctic access for military operations
- Preventing Chinese/Russian dominance
- Rare earth supply chain security
- ICBM early warning systems
- NATO northern flank security

???????? **CHINA'S ARCTIC AMBITIONS:**

Despite being thousands of miles from the Arctic, China declared itself a "near-Arctic state" and has invested heavily:

**The "Polar Silk Road":**
- Part of Belt and Road Initiative
- Infrastructure investments across Nordic countries
- Icebreaker construction program (2 operational, more planned)
- Research stations in Iceland, Norway
- Observer status in Arctic Council (since 2013)

**Greenland specific attempts:**
- 2018: Offered to fund 3 major airport projects ($555M loan)
→ Blocked by US/Denmark pressure
→ Denmark funded instead ($691M)
- Mining investments in zinc, lead, rare earths
→ Multiple licenses revoked under pressure
- Partnership offers repeatedly rebuffed

**Why China wants in:**
- 90% of rare earth processing already controlled by China
- Greenland rare earths = reinforce monopoly
- Arctic shipping routes reduce dependence on Malacca Strait
- Strategic positioning against US
- Resource security for growing economy

???????? **RUSSIA'S ARCTIC EXPANSION:**

Russia has the longest Arctic coastline and is moving aggressively:
- 40+ icebreakers (US has 2, building more)
- Northern Fleet reactivation
- Military bases across Arctic frontier
- Underwater flag planting at North Pole (2007)
- Claims to Arctic seabed extending to North Pole
- Nuclear-powered icebreakers for year-round access
- Northern Sea Route development (Russia controls)

???????? **CANADA'S CLAIMS:**

Canada claims the Northwest Passage as internal waters:
- US disputes this (calls it international waters)
- Sovereignty patrols increasing
- Indigenous rights considerations
- Overlapping seabed claims with Russia, Denmark/Greenland
???? **WHAT GREENLANDERS WANT:**

Surveys show:
- 68% oppose Chinese investment in Greenland
- Growing support for independence from Denmark (varies 30-68%)
- Want economic development but on their terms
- Prefer Western/Nordic partnerships over Chinese
- Concerned about colonial history repeating
- Aware of growing leverage as Arctic opens
- Divided on large-scale mining (environmental concerns)
**The leverage calculation:**
Greenland provides Denmark with:
- Massive territorial waters
- Arctic Council seat relevance
- Strategic military position
- Resource potential

Without Greenland, Denmark becomes much smaller geopolitically—and Greenlanders know it.

???? **KEYWORDS & TOPICS:**
#Greenland #Arctic #Geopolitics
Category
ICELAND
Tags
greenland, arctic, china vs usa
Commenting disabled.